Month: February 2017

Broadchurch Is Back

landscape-1481754749-broadchurchh

Everyone’s favourite miserable coastal town cop show returned last night and it’s as gripping as we’re used to. The cast (old and new) are on sparkling form and it looks like we’re promised a heartbreaking, dramatic and twisty-turny case to puzzle and poke over for the next few weeks. It’s nice to have Broadchurch back.

What needs to be remembered, of course, is that Broadchruch is not a gritty and realistic drama, really. It’s a sort of harrowing novel-on-screen. The chapters are distinct and organised in such a way as to drag the drama out without a dip in thrills. Already we’ve been given a hint at who may be the first suspect, with one character seemingly having a piece of evidence in their possession.

“This isn’t Trumpton, I don’t know everyone!” snaps Ellie Miller (Olivia Coleman) midway through last night’s opener. You’d be forgiven for thinking otherwise, however. Series One’s unfortunate family – the Latimers – are still here: Mark Latimer has apparently co-authored an interview book about the murder of his son; the local newspaper editor has asked the questions and the local vicar is now trying to soothe Mark’s regrets about the project. Beth Latimer is working as a crisis support worker, is fairly new to the role (it seems) and has been assigned to the case of this series’ victim Trish (the brilliant Julie Hesmondhalgh), who has been raped.

The apparent prime suspect in the sexual assault case that is this series’ focus is the husband of the victim’s best friend. Trish and her friend Cath (Sarah Parish) work for Lenny Henry’s uppity and impatient (or is he just acting suspiciously?!) farm foods store manager. Olivia Coleman’s character’s husband was the murderer in series one and now her fifteen-year-old son is selling porn at school; expect him to become a suspect in some way in a future episode. David Tennant’s character’s teenage daughter is out with a group of friends who will, I presume, leave her alone at some point to walk home in the dark. Will she too become a victim of Broadchurch’s (soon-to-be) serial sexual assailant?

While the subject matter is being handled – already – with great sensitivity and care, I wonder if the twists and turns ahead will shake a few people up. I foresee a few inconsistencies in Trish’s account of her assault – maybe enough to put a cat among the pigeons at the police station – which may change the headlines from “Broadchurch handles sexual assault storyline with sensitivity” to “Broadchurch cop doesn’t believe rape victim!!” Maybe I’m wrong, but it’ll be just the kind of leftfield curveball Broadchurch is known for (Danny Latimer’s murderer was found Not Guilty at the climax of series two and was effectively exiled from Broadchurch by a coalition of all the characters we’d met so far).

If the series can keep up its slightly-unreal, bizarrely-formulaic yet utterly, utterly enthralling form then we’re in for a treat. And with a cast like this, it’ll be worth the watch, even if the plot flops. I trust in the show. Bring me more!

To Tip Or Not To Tip?

tips.jpg

In the United States it is normal to tip 20% of your bill at a restaurant. You would be thought of as rude or ungrateful by most if you didn’t. This is, in part, because some establishments in some states allow a “tip credit” to count as a part of the minimum wage. This means that some places will pay as little as “$2 plus tips” so in this instance the staff will be relying on the generosity and gratitude of customers.

In the UK things are different. We have laws that prevent companies from paying less than the national minimum wage. Tips, therefore, always count as extra. But who should you tip, why and when? A conversation on Twitter between artist Moose Allain [@MooseAllain] and journalist Zoe Margolis [@girlonetrack] (and others, in replies) prompted me to do a bit of thinking about my own tipping etiquette.  I think I’ve got it down to a rather imprecise one-line rule-of-thumb: If I end an encounter feeling like I’d happily buy the person providing the service a pint, if we were out in a pub, then I’ll tip. If they’ve just “done their job” and little else, then I’ve already contributed to their wage through paying for the service.

But it really isn’t that straight forward. For example, my wife Aimee made a very good point about tipping in restaurants. She said if you enjoyed your meal you wouldn’t think to tip the chef. You may not think twice about tipping your waiter, however. And that’s true. The people who actually made your meal aren’t really thought about; you may throw out a “my compliments to the chef” if you were feeling chatty. But the person who carried the food to the table will probably get a few quid from you at the end of the night. Maybe this is based on an assumption that the waiting staff are lower-paid than the kitchen staff. As someone who worked in the kitchens of Wagamama for a year, long ago, I can promise you this is not necessarily the case at all. In fact, the few waiting staff at the restaurant I worked at were all considered senior front of house personnel and were on a good quid and a half more than I was, (I was called a ramen chef).

Then there’s the system some places have that sees all of the tips put into the same pot and divided (either equally or not) among all of the staff. I’ve known of places that do this that give the management a big share, the chef a smaller share, and the kitchen and waiting staff next to nothing. Is that fair? Would you think to tip the manager on your way out? Of course you wouldn’t.

So who should you tip? Or rather, who should you tip? The conversation on Twitter was sparked with a question about whether you should tip the Tesco grocery delivery driver. My answer would be “if they were friendly, helpful and left me happier than they found me then yes”. If on the other hand they turned up, thumped the door, mumbled about the shopping, dumped the bags and drove off then they’ve simply done their job and the wage my shopping bill contributes toward should suffice. Or, per my rule, if they left me thinking “yeah, I’d buy that person a beer/coffee” then they get a tip in line with that. If not, they don’t. As I say, it’s very imprecise. I mean, what about taxi drivers?

It’s customary in the UK, so says Trip Advisor, to round the taxi fare up to the nearest pound, both as a gesture of thanks and as a means of simplifying payment by cash for both driver and passenger. But if you have a chatty, funny or interesting driver you may want to give him an extra few quid. Or if he’s made a number of pickups or dropoffs along the journey, you may want to give him something extra for his trouble. Of course, it’s no trouble in purely monetary terms. The meter is running. But we do it anyway, don’t we?

Take bin men. You don’t tip your bin man or your window cleaner or the man who does your guttering once a month, but you may stick a fiver in a card at Christmas. You don’t do this for the local newsagent, usually, or for the postman. Maybe you do. But the usual receivers of this festive gesture are window cleaners and bin men. This is because the cash, we know, will go into their pockets. It’s for the person, not the company they work for. Though how many of us actually know for sure who has been collecting our rubbish all year? We give it to whoever does so around Christmas time. So it’s not about who did it, but about someone having done it.

Tipping is a funny thing. I tend to leave a tip of around 10% in restaurants almost every time. I think, having actually considered it, I don’t so much “tip good service” as “not tip bad service”… It’s a minefield of but what abouts; I’m not sure there’s a rule at all. Which brings me back to my unreliable rule-of-thumb: If the person providing a service ingratiates themselves to me in some way – if they’re unexpectedly helpful, or if we discover through chatting that we share interests or something – then they’ll immediately guarantee themselves a tip from me. I don’t like chatty taxi drivers, as a rule, so I round up. I don’t know my bin men so leave the Christmas bonuses to my Mum who lives down the road and almost always slips them a tenner in December. I’ve been known not to tip based totally on appearance or demeanour, which is a fucking awful thing to admit; the nerdy ones get a tip, the sporty, jock-types not so much.

I’ve waffled on forever, for which I apologise. I’ve repeated myself time and again while saying very little, really. I don’t think there is a conclusion to make. Some people tip, some don’t. I’ve stayed away from talking about tipping based on what you can afford (and also tipping in fast food restaurants, at bars, at theatres or cinemas or concerts, or hotel staff – a dollar a bag in the US, right? – etc), though that too must come into some people’s decision-making process, no? If you’re eating out but are on a budget does ‘not tipping’ become a more acceptable thing? Should it matter? Who knows?

What I do know is that my shows of generosity (but is it that? Or is it just habit? Maybe I’m it’s simply social convention; I’m tipping to fit in!) tends to gravitate toward those consider to have an ‘underdog status’ in their company hierarchy, or even their life. But then who am I to judge that?! I find the whole tipping thing a bit vulgar, a bit awkward, a bit strained. Basically, if I like you – whatever you might be doing for me – I’ll show my appreciation with a cash tip; it’s impolite to ask every waiter and waitress you take a shine to out for drinks, especially when you’re married with a kid.

So, how do I end this waste-of-time of a blog post? There’s only one way. I’ll ask you what you do. Tipping: Yay? Nay? When do you do it and when do you not? What’s your reasoning about who and why and when and how much? I’d love to know because I’m fucking stumped.

PS: I found the Trip Advisor advice on “Tipping and Etiquette” to be a very interesting and unintentionally hilarious read. You can see the UK Advice here and the US Advice here. Thanks.

Death In Paradise: New Dog, Old Tricks

12827700-high-death-in-paradise-s6-630x400.jpg

You’d expect a show as unashamedly formulaic as Death In Paradise to start feeling a bit stale, six series and three leading men in. I’ve often described the show as a sort of ‘Jonathan Creek in the Sun‘ though I’m not sure that’s fair anymore. Jonathan Creek shook off the trappings of “tried and tested formula” for a run of specials; Creek now has a wife, a posh country home and an office job. What’s missing now, however, is the charm. Creek worked because its lead was a magician’s ingenieur who lived in a windmill and solved bizarre locked-room mysteries, as a sideline, with a wisecracking investigative reporter. Now he’s a 50-year-old insurance salesman (or something) who only seems to solve puzzles reluctantly and with half the genius we’re used to. Shakin’ up the formula, in my opinion, didn’t work. Give me good old early-days Jonathan Creek any day of the week…

…which is, I suppose, a long-winded way of saying that it’s a good thing Death In Paradise still seems to be happy embracing the trusted formula. A group of supporting characters gather, we’re given a glimpse of their group dynamic. One of them is killed. Roll titles. Next, it’s time for our quirky UK DI-out-of-water to lead his team of Caribbean cops in a whodunitandwhy that involves secrets revealed, red herrings, dead ends and sunshine scenery. Then, like clockwork, the supporting cast are gathered at the crime scene so our hero can reveal the killer in monologue. It worked when Ben Miller was the boss in series 1 and 2, and continued to work when Kris Marshall took over for series 3, 4, 5 and 6. Now we have Ardal O’Hanlon steering the ship and it seems it’ll be given room to work going forward. The format is the star. We know what we’re getting and we love it.

Good, then, is the news that O’Hanlon is a brilliant replacement for Marshall. Tonight was the first “proper” case for DI Jack Mooney and he was wonderful. Tonight Mooney and the crew reopened an 8-year-old cold case, the murder of the local newspaper editor. I won’t spoil it – the whole series is available to revisit on iPlayer, with every series streaming on Netflix – but it still feels like the same old show. Six series in and the mysteries are as strong as they were at the beginning, the supporting casts as wonderfully “that him from…” as ever and, despite there being only three main cast members who have been with us from the start (Dwayne, the Commissioner and Katherine the bar owner) Honore Police feel like family. While most shows are trying to think outside the box, with varying results, Death In Paradise knows what it does works and works well. Ratings are higher than some of the BBC’s most beloved shows (Death In Paradise got almost double the viewers than Doctor Who last year, on average). It’s become a future classic in its own right. Not bad for a daft comedy drama that set out simply to be bright, exciting and fun. Tick, tick, tick. Bravo, Death In Paradise. Bravo.

It makes me sad that there’s only one episode left this series. But with the promise of more to come, I’m happy to wait for my fix of slaughter in the sun. Series 7, I hope, will be just as much fun as usual and, with Jack Mooney up front, I think the format is in safe hands. I can’t wait for more.